TOPIC 1: Immigration, Deportation and Child Labor
The first article we read was "The Slaughterhouse Kids". The article discussed a how a meat processing plant in Iowa was hiring minors to work longs hours in a dangerous environment with little compensation and no benefits. As, a result of the kids illegal status they were to be deported to their native country. Before reading the article we brainstormed what is means to be a child. After our brainstorm we concluded that kids are responsible for going to school, homework, learning, cleaning up their room, playing games and spending time with their family. During our reading we stopped to think and discuss if the kids in the article were able to fulfill "kid responsibilities" if they were working 12 to 16 hours a day. One student blurted out What that's CRAZY! How are they supposed do all their stuff? When do they sleep or eat or play?" . Bingo! - this is the reaction I was waiting for! I made sure to note his question on the board because I knew that it was a question I wanted to go back to. After reading this article we discussed two themes, Immigration and Deportation and Child Labor Laws. As a result of this lesson, I found out that many of my students knew about deportation and immigration on a personal level since they and their families were recent immigrants. One student expressed his experience and feelings about his father being deported last year.
The next conversation we had was about the second issue presented in the article - Child Labor.The issue of child labor was completely new to all of my students. In order to really understand what child labor is we referred to our list of what it means to be a kid versus the limited opportunities and restrictions children who were working faced. The students had emotional responses- Emilio - ""No! That's not fair! Why do the kids need to go back? The boss should go to jail... the kids need to go to school." Arianne- "The boss needs to pay the kids for all of their work and pay for their college".
After our conversation, I realized that my students felt an emotional connection to this issue. I wanted to tap into their feelings a deep further but I realized time was running short. So I asked them to do a quick write on their feelings by answering the following question - "After reading the article, "The Slaughterhouse Kids": 1. Do you think it was fair for children to work in meat processing plants 2.What do you think should have happened to the owner of the factory? the kids who worked their?
INSERT STUDENT WORK
After thought: This lesson was extremely long for one sitting, it should really have been two separate lesson. Yet, because I am in a bilingual classroom I had to implement the lesson in one day due to scheduling challenges. I recommend that the lesson be done in two parts, to ensure that students are able to fully understand and gain a deeper grasp of the actual issue at hand. Also, a few weeks later I stumbled upon what happened to the meat processing plant in a follow up article by IndyKids!,
TOPIC 2: Accessibility of Fresh Foods
The second issue that I brought up to the student's attention was meant to target accessibility of fresh foods and student food choice. I noticed that many students in the classroom were eating chips or cookies for breakfast, lunch and snack. I wanted to first present the issue in a way that was not judgmental. I didn't want them to feel bad about their eating habits, because I wanted to get an actual representation of which foods they chose to eat. It was important for me to frame the issue in a neutral light, well as best as I could. We began our investigation by taking a survey of what we like to eat for snacks. We (yes, teacher too!)secretly wrote them down on a slip of paper and put them in a bag. Then, we read aloud the anonymous responses and categorized them into two categories Healthy and Not so Healthy.
![]() |
| Written in English and Spanish. |
Overall, 15 votes were for "Not-So-Healthy" snacks while only 2 votes were for "Healthy" snacks. After we voted we read the IndyKids! article, "Fresh Foods or Fast Foods?". This article stated four reasons why some people don't eat enough healthy foods:
1. Low-income areas don’t have as many supermarkets and grocery stores as middle and high-income neighborhoods.
2. Stores in low-income neighborhoods have fewer healthy items and have lower-quality fresh
fruits and vegetables.
3. If they are available, fresh foods in low-income areas are unaffordable.
4. There is a lack of public transportation to supermarkets so people have a hard time getting to them.
The conversation that proceeded this lesson was rich with student opinions and connections to their real-life experiences. Students made real life connections when they stated that many of them took the bus or a taxi to get to a local supermarket. They also had questions about eating healthy. "What are fresh foods? How do we eat healthy? Why do we need to eat healthy? "
After thoughts: Due to the language, this article was challenging to read for my students. What worked really well for me was to project the article on the projector screen and have a shared reading with the students. For next time, I would previously scan the area around the school and map out where students could purchase healthy foods and where supermarkets were located.











